Programme evaluations
Baseline, midline, endline, formative, summative, process and impact evaluations. Method selection, sampling and limits are agreed before fieldwork, with a report that distinguishes evidence from inference.
IT & digital services
Ask a useful question. Build evidence you can use.
We connect research methods, field operations and analysis so the final output can inform a decision, not just occupy a folder.
Field data collection
Local quantitative and qualitative collection teams using digital tools. Training, supervision, consent and quality checks are included in the field plan.
Data cleaning and analysis
Documented validation, indicator calculation and interpretation. We make missing data and quality limitations visible instead of hiding them behind a dashboard.
Embedded dashboards and iMap Analytics
Translate evaluation and operational reporting into interactive views where appropriate. Indicator definitions, access permissions and refresh frequency are explicit; live data is not promised unless a working source supports it.
Geographic and sector reporting
Spatial and programme views for health, education, agriculture, climate and development. The map supports the question, with appropriate aggregation and privacy controls.
Scope questions
Before we start.
Can reports match a donor’s format?
We can scope the indicator definitions, templates and reporting requirements with you before building the output.
Do all evaluations need a dashboard?
No. A clear report may be the right output. We add a dashboard when repeated decisions, updates and users justify it.
Start with a conversation
Let’s scope the work properly.
We will agree requirements, deliverables, responsibilities and support terms.